This is Part Two in a series of posts about how service firms bill for their services following yesterday’s introductory post. From hourly billing, retainers and project fees to alternate billing methods, We will be looking at each method and its strengths and weaknesses, and also some alternatives.

But before we get into comparing these method, let’s first review one billing method that every service firm should use; the assessment phase. For most service firm engagements, the beginning is usually the toughest. You have a pretty clear idea of the services you offer and the value the client should receive, but at the beginning it’s a little fuzzy to understand the totality of the client’s situation, their capacity, and how much value they will likely gain from your services.

Your clients have a similar issue. They know their problem intimately, but they don’t always understand your services, how you work, what you will require from them, and the results they might achieve. Further, neither of you knows what it will be like to work with the other. This gap in understanding prevents a lot of service work from being sold. The solution is an assessment.

In an assessment, the service provider agrees to provide a small amount of value (usually in compiling the data and framing the work to be done). This should be something that provides real value for the client, but not something that “solves” their problem. The service provider spends substantial time and effort in this stage to learn the business and situation that the client is in. During this phase, I like to say the client and service provider are “dating.” At the end of assessment, the service provider knows in much greater detail what the client needs, what assets they have to work with, what obstacles there are to overcome and what results are achievable. The client knows better what their situation is, how trustworthy and reliable the service provider is, and they may gain a more realistic view of the outcome of a longer engagement.

This assessment works best when it’s short in duration and scope, and priced low enough that it’s a “no brainer” for the client. This sets the stage for a more in-depth and credible proposal for the longer project, and increases the likelihood that the client and service provider will agree on the value of the work to be accomplished.

An Assessment phase lowers the risk for both the client and the service provider by helping each to more clearly uncover and understand the strengths, weaknesses and capabilities of the other. They also mitigate many of the risks and weaknesses of the pricing structures we will address in the next several posts.

Do you use an assessment phase in your work? What are the benefits? What are the risks?

---

Brad Farris is a small business advisor with Anchor Advisors, Ltd. in Chicago, Il. Since 2001 Anchor Advisors has been helping creative professional firms to grow, by helping them clarify their purpose, get the most from their people, keep their eye on key performance measures, and implement consistent processes. Brad is also the author of The Business Owner’s Champion: 6 Practices to Build your Nerve and your Business.